The brand new survey contains step 3 bits. Area We included questions regarding socio-group data (ages, amount of training, parity, familial money, community, most recent relationship updates, sexual passion, reputation of HPV inoculation, and you may reputation for unpredictable cervical cancer tumors tests).
Part II comprised of 6 questions about the target ladies who are going to be screened, ages to begin with, frequency, many years or requirements to cease regarding evaluating, and methods from tests. Just the users who’d ever heard regarding HPV perform go ahead to Region III hence assessed information about HPV out of the types of (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), form off signal and you may prevention.
Before the studies, the fresh survey of part II and you will area III when you look at the Thai variation had been contemplated, chatted about, and revised up until consensus certainly 20 experts who were every gynecologic oncologists (some have been authors in other parallel degree). The experts rated every one of 19 concerns while the often ‘relevant’ or ‘maybe not relevant’. The thing-top Posts Validity Directory (I-CVI) was calculated each item, in addition to Content Validity Directory (CVI) was determined if you take the common proportion away from 14 questions about knowledge about cervical cancer tests and you can 5 questions relating to HPV. This new CVI was basically 1 for both components of the latest survey (S1 Table). The newest precision is actually checked for the 30 feminine with the exact same attribute because participants. The fresh new Cronbach’ Ekstra ressourcer leader coefficients toward reliability was indeed 0.819 to own understanding of cervical malignant tumors examination and you will 0.907 having understanding of HPV.
To the day off scheduled colposcopy, the study secretary given suggestions of your own analysis on female just who met inclusion standards. The women who wanted to take part offered authored advised concur and responded the fresh survey on their own by themselves just before continuing in order to colposcopy.
Study obtained because of it data was basically socio-demographic study (Part I of one’s questionnaire), knowledge of cervical cancer tumors testing (Region II), and you will experience with HPV (Region III).
The answers of knowledge regarding cervical cancer tumors screening and you will HPV was in fact analyzed by the for every product prior to scoring categorization. Right respond to is actually obtained just like the 1 whereas ‘wrong and you will being unsure of answer’ are obtained 0.
Out of fourteen inquiries off cervical cancer tumors tests, women whoever get were ? ten was randomly classified due to the fact with ‘a knowledge’ otherwise was indeed considered as having “negative studies”. Having experience in HPV, women whose address are ‘never ever observed HPV’ was in fact omitted about investigation out-of HPV degree.
Of 5 questions, women whose score was basically ? 3 was thought to be with ‘a experience with HPV’ usually as ‘bad knowledge’. Off 19 concerns, women whoever rating were ? 13 were classified while the that have ‘a good overall knowledge’ normally since ‘not good total knowledge’.
All data had been built-up inside the a digital databases and you may assessed having fun with SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Detailed analytics were used to analyze market research and you will had been described since the numbers that have payment, suggest having basic deviation otherwise average which have range. The fresh new connection ranging from per changeable and you will training score was in fact reviewed using easy linear regression. Exploratory model was developed when you look at the multivariable research as well as all the variables potentially related to the info rating. The fresh new felt amount of analytical value try a good p-worth of 0.05 otherwise shorter.
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>